# GCVE-BCP-11 - Community-Proposed Updates to Existing CVE Records

**URL:** <https://discourse.ossbase.org/t/gcve-bcp-11-community-proposed-updates-to-existing-cve-records/1110>\
**Category:** GCVE\
**Tags:** gcve\
**Created:** [July 13, 2026, 4:26pm UTC](https://discourse.ossbase.org/t/gcve-bcp-11-community-proposed-updates-to-existing-cve-records/1110 "2026-07-13T16:26:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adulau](https://discourse.ossbase.org/user_avatar/discourse.ossbase.org/adulau/32/6_2.png) [@adulau](https://discourse.ossbase.org/u/adulau)\
**Post date:** [August 8, 2026, 9:26pm UTC](https://discourse.ossbase.org/t/gcve-bcp-11-community-proposed-updates-to-existing-cve-records/1110/14 "2026-08-08T21:26:27Z")

</div>

Thanks for the feedback.

If I understand correctly, you want to have a default resolved view? outside the `A publication service MAY provide a resolved community view for consumers that do not want to perform separate CVE and contribution lookups.`

You mean to have a resolved view on the special GNA 65530 in the index. So we (as GCVE) provide one and if someone doesn’t like the default GNA resolving view, they can switch to another provider with a different policy.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.ossbase.org/t/gcve-bcp-11-community-proposed-updates-to-existing-cve-records/1110)._