# GCVE corrections to upstream data?

**URL:** <https://discourse.ossbase.org/t/gcve-corrections-to-upstream-data/1099>\
**Category:** GCVE\
**Created:** [June 9, 2026, 10:08am UTC](https://discourse.ossbase.org/t/gcve-corrections-to-upstream-data/1099 "2026-06-09T10:08:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adulau](https://discourse.ossbase.org/user_avatar/discourse.ossbase.org/adulau/32/6_2.png) [@adulau](https://discourse.ossbase.org/u/adulau)\
**Post date:** [July 10, 2026, 3:09pm UTC](https://discourse.ossbase.org/t/gcve-corrections-to-upstream-data/1099/10 "2026-07-10T15:09:16Z")

</div>

@cedric Should we register a special GNA for CVE proposal in the prefix around 65530 ? and then all the proposal received via GNA-1 is actually published as this alternative GNA? and the ID is actually the CVE-ID not changed.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.ossbase.org/t/gcve-corrections-to-upstream-data/1099)._